Prayer in Public Schools Essays -- Religion in Public Schools

Prayer in human beings SchoolsReligion is one of the most controversial issues in society today. The pertain of allowing prayer in shallows is an on-going debate and has resulted in numerous lawsuits. Religious school clubs, after school activities, curriculums, and moments of silence during school are just a few of the court nerves that judges have administered. People in privilege of prayer in schools believe that their children heap only learn authentic values through sacred practice. On the other hand, an individual against religious practice in schools views this issue as an infringement on his or her childrens castigates as Americans. In a particular trial, Wallace V. Jaffree, an argument arose concerning a one-minute meditation or voluntary prayer in public schools (Wallace V. Jaffree). George Wallace, a governor of aluminum, agreed with the 1981 Alabama Statute (16-1-20.1) authorizing this 1-minute period of silence in all public schools (Wallace V. Jaffree). The District Court agreed with Wallace and ultimately held that the psychiatric hospital Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a State from establishing a religion (Wallace V. Jaffree). In contrast, Appellee Ishmael Jaffree, a resident of Mobile County, Alabama objected this Alabama Statute. Since the one-minute prayer was voluntary, his children did not participate. They were then exposed to ostracism from their fellow group class members for not participating (Wallace V. Jaffree). In the Wallace versus Jaffree trial, Jaffree has a stronger case because his complaints are justified through both the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the ideology of Separation of Church and State. According to the First Amendment, Congress shall make no law re... ...a particular faith. Individuals against religion in schools do not postulate a faith to be part of a school day. Where do we draw the line? The individuals who support religion in schools have the right not to pract ice religion. In contrast, individuals against religion in schools have the analogous right to not practice religion. In this particular case, or either other cases that may occur in the future, further research can be accomplished by identifying the boundaries for each argument. Sometimes the issues are so closely related that the solution becomes difficult to distinguish. Other times, evaluating the opinions of others helps to gain a broad consensus of what the majority desires. With this further research, there could be a purify understanding of individuals opposing thoughts, which could help establish a common ground and a solution to different cases.